Small Mosaic


Categories:

books
career
codinghorrors
comics
events
geekstuff
justdont
languages
languages/bash
linkshot
magazines
meta
misctech
movies
nottech
operatingsystems
operatingsystems/linux
operatingsystems/linux/debian
operatingsystems/solaris
paranoidadmin
perl
ruby
security
security/apache
security/tools
serversmells
sites
specifications
sysadmin
tools
tools/commandline
tools/firefox
tools/gui
tools/network
tools/online
tools/online/greasemonkey
unixdaemon

Archives:

August 200810
July 20089
April 20084
March 20081
February 20081
January 200815
August 20072
June 20079
May 20076
April 20078
March 200731
February 20073
January 200721
December 20061
November 20064
October 20066
September 200632
August 200617
July 200614
June 20069
May 200613
March 200611
February 200616
January 200611
December 20051
November 20056
October 200519
September 200525
August 200516
July 200516
June 200513
May 20052
April 200519
March 200531
February 200520
January 200531
December 200421
November 200430
October 200432
September 200418
August 20047
July 200414
June 20045

Sun, 12 Jun 2005

Design Mistakes -- xinetd and crucial.com
Twice today I've suddenly stopped what I was doing and thought, they must have set out to make this awkward... The first incident was also the simplest one, in xinetd config files you'll often find "disable = yes". Firstly this is insane because you should assume something's off and people will turn it on if they want it. This is a basic principle that should be stuck to. Secondly the option is strange to read. "enable = yes" or better "enable = true" is much easier to mentally parse than "disable = yes".

The second one annoys me as it's a step backwards, Crucial UK have a memory selection tool that tells you how much memory your laptop can take. In the past it'd present all the options and highlight one in yellow as a recommendation. I used it every six months and it was simple, intuitive and consistent.

Today I went to buy some memory for an Inspiron 5160 (which has the backspace key one row in and is driving me nuts!). In order to make the "experience" simpler for the less willing to actually read the page buyers they've changed to only offering one on the initial page and hiding the others behind the "All memory upgrades" tab. They almost missed out on my custom as I want 2 1GB chips and the name of the tab distracted me. While I'd like it to all be put back on the same page if they won't do this then maybe they'll rename it, "all upgrades for selected model" perhaps?

Like this post? - Digg Me! | Add to del.icio.us! | reddit this!

Posted: 2005/06/12 16:21 | /misctech | Permanent link to this entry | This entry + same date


books career codinghorrors events geekstuff justdont languages/bash linkshot magazines meta misctech movies nottech operatingsystems/linux operatingsystems/linux/debian operatingsystems/solaris perl ruby security security/apache security/tools serversmells sites specifications sysadmin tools/commandline tools/firefox tools/gui tools/network tools/online tools/online/greasemonkey unixdaemon

Copyright © 2000-2005 Dean Wilson XML feed logo