Small Mosaic


Categories:

books
career
codinghorrors
comics
events
geekstuff
justdont
languages
languages/bash
linkshot
magazines
meta
misctech
movies
nottech
operatingsystems
operatingsystems/linux
operatingsystems/linux/debian
operatingsystems/solaris
paranoidadmin
perl
ruby
security
security/apache
security/tools
serversmells
sites
specifications
sysadmin
tools
tools/commandline
tools/firefox
tools/gui
tools/network
tools/online
tools/online/greasemonkey
unixdaemon

Archives:

August 200810
July 20089
April 20084
March 20081
February 20081
January 200815
August 20072
June 20079
May 20076
April 20078
March 200731
February 20073
January 200721
December 20061
November 20064
October 20066
September 200632
August 200617
July 200614
June 20069
May 200613
March 200611
February 200616
January 200611
December 20051
November 20056
October 200519
September 200525
August 200516
July 200516
June 200513
May 20052
April 200519
March 200531
February 200520
January 200531
December 200421
November 200430
October 200432
September 200418
August 20047
July 200414
June 20045

Sun, 19 Sep 2004

Just Don't (3 of ?) - Set up a Website Without ServerAliases
Here is a rarity, something that annoys the hell out of me :). If you have a website then your goal is to get people to view it, or at least it should be if you're sane. So why the heck do so many site admins require me to type in the 'www.' before I can view the site? All it needs is a "ServerAlias domainname" in the Apache config; or what ever you IIS people use instead. Your users can then access the site with a simple http://domainname.tld and everything works fine. And I might actually use your site and click on the damn adverts.

Like this post? - Digg Me! | Add to del.icio.us! | reddit this!

Posted: 2004/09/19 21:23 | /justdont | Permanent link to this entry | This entry + same date


IRC -- The Infinite Monkey Theory at Work
I've never been a huge IRC person but I do like amusing quotes, if you get a bored five minutes it's well worth having a sift through both Bash.org and QDB.us. The quality of the humour varies a lot but some of it is good wholesome geek humour. And a lot of it isn't :)

Like this post? - Digg Me! | Add to del.icio.us! | reddit this!

Posted: 2004/09/19 09:51 | /sites | Permanent link to this entry | This entry + same date


Incomplete Ideas -- Knoppix, UML and CDs in books
If you're reading this site then there are pretty good odds you own a number of tech books, take a look around your shelves and admire your collection. Now think about the number of those books that include a CD, next try and think of an included CD that was actually useful. Did you think of any? If you did you are a better man than me.

One of the reasons CDs are seldom included in tech books is the shelf life of the book vs the software contained within. A book can sit on a shelf for years, by the time someone buys the book the software may not even run on the current kernel version of a *Nix box; this is more a Unix problem as Microsoft are actually good at ensuring backwards compatibility. The other downside here is that the contents of the CD are "added value" and are not part of everyones experience with the book.

I'm going to make a suggestion for an in-book CD that will actually ADD value to the book rather than just be an afterthought, and it's all made possible by the power of Linux. My fictional books title is NFS the complete guide, on the CD is a custom version of Knoppix that boots into a GUI and runs a UML instance in the background. The reader can then work through the book as usual but at any point they want to get hands on and understand more about what they are doing they drop in the CD, boot up and then have a client and a server, both mostly ready for use, that are configured to represent the ideal environment to test out the examples in the book. In this case one instance of the server would have NFS support compiled in to allow the reader to experiment with exporting mount points in a known working environment while the second would require a kernel compile to add NFS taking the user through the process step-by-step. Or the reader could do it the old way and set up their own test machines.

None of this requires any local modification to the local disk-drives or their contents. If the user wants to save files then they can either save to a USB key (which are insanely cheap these days) or to an online ftp/web/workplace server that will hold their files. The example given above is a simple one but the concept applies to a number of different book types, network service related books (DNS, DHCP) are ideal, another example would be a book on DNS, the CD could contain two servers to allow the reader to test out the information presented in the chapters on delegation or replication. More end user focused topics such as using OpenOffice could be done just as easily.

So what are the down-sides? More work for the people producing the books is the most obvious, assuming the user has a machine with enough grunt to drive the UMLs is a second. As the title stated this idea isn't complete but it's one I feel is worth watching, the technologies involved seem ideal for each other and open up a number of powerful options.

Like this post? - Digg Me! | Add to del.icio.us! | reddit this!

Posted: 2004/09/19 00:01 | /misctech | Permanent link to this entry | This entry + same date


books career codinghorrors events geekstuff justdont languages/bash linkshot magazines meta misctech movies nottech operatingsystems/linux operatingsystems/linux/debian operatingsystems/solaris perl ruby security security/apache security/tools serversmells sites specifications sysadmin tools/commandline tools/firefox tools/gui tools/network tools/online tools/online/greasemonkey unixdaemon

Copyright © 2000-2005 Dean Wilson XML feed logo